HDTV Antenna Logo HDTv Antenna Labs
All About HD Antennas
Subscribe Subscribe to
the HDTV Labs Feed!

Winegard HD9095P HDTV Antenna Reviews


Winegard HD9095P antenna reviews: 3
Winegard HD9095P average rating: 4.3

Excellent 2 reviews
Good 0 reviews
Average 1 reviews
Poor 0 reviews
Very Poor 0 reviews
Winegard HD9095P antenna

Band: UHF
Placement: Outdoor
Amplifier: No
Range: 60 miles
Color area: Blue
Compare prices on Winegard HD9095P
Write a review

Winegard HD9095P reviews to 3:

Winegard HD9095P Review #0
Rating: 5 (excellent) Nickname: Ennui Date: 2010-02-16
Summary: Excellent antenna
I have been using this antenna for about 5 years. It has the big advantage of mounting on one side of the mast. This was good for me because LA stations are north of me and this puts the antenna over the roof so bird ... is not a problem on my white patio cover. This antenna, as noted, also has an input connection for a separate VHF antenna input. This made it easy to add the YA1713 a few months ago using the same coax and 8275 preamp that was already installed. Performance is very good.


Winegard HD9095P Review #1
Rating: 5 (excellent) Nickname: anonymous Date: 2009-06-09
Summary: It works better than other antennas for me
A wind storm damaged my AntennaCraft HD1850 so I replaced it with the HD9095 that provides a signal strength at or near 100%. As compared to the AntennaCraft at 60% on the best days. The 9095 is at about 75% on the worst reception days. This is with all other factors the same - rotor - Winegard AP8275 pre-amp. All stations are UHF digital so I thought that I no longer needed a VHF antenna. I have recently learned that some stations are changing to VHF digital on June 12. It is nice that I can connect a VHF only antenna to the 9095 without causing a loss of signal strength (insertion loss).


Winegard HD9095P Review #2
Rating: 3 (average) Nickname: Tigerbangs Date: 2008-12-11
Summary: Well made, but only an average performer
My experience with Winegard UHF yagi antennas has been spotty: while they are rugged, I have replaced several of them in the past few years for people who live in areas with a lot of UHF stations because they underperformed in medium to deep-fringe situations. I am at a loss to explain this, because my experience with Winegard is generally pretty good, but the HD series of Winegard UHF antennas seems to have some reception issues that I was able to solve by replacing them with either a Channel Master 4228 or an AntennasDirect XG-91. This is a fairly heavy antenna by UHF standards, it can create some long-term problems with some rotators because of it's front-heavy design. It mounts from its end, and not in the middle like most yagis, so it is a bit unbalanced when mounted on a rotator. I have seen 2 Channel Master rotator motors fail when using this antenna, and I suspect that the mounting imbalance could have been the cause.


Check other HDTV antenna reviews...